This page explains the methodology by which the data in the Egypt Death Penalty Index was collected and verified.
Users will encounter some terms in the Egypt Death Penalty Index with which they may be unfamiliar. These include:
Preliminary vs. confirmed death sentences
The Index tracks individuals who met one of two outcomes at trial before a civilian or military court in Egypt: either a “preliminary death sentence” (sometimes also called a “recommended death sentence” or a “death sentence referral”) or a “confirmed death sentence.” The distinction between these is central to understanding the way in which death sentences progress through the judicial system in Egypt.
Under Article 381 of Egypt’s Code of Criminal Procedure, there are two requirements on the three-judge criminal court panel before it may confirm a death sentence and formally issue its verdict. The first is that they have reached a preliminary, unanimous decision on the death sentence. The second requirement is that the panel of judges must refer this preliminary death sentence to the Grand Mufti – Egypt’s highest religious authority, which is currently held by jurist Sheikh Dr Shawki Allam. The Grand Mufti issues an opinion on the preliminary death sentence, which the panel of judges then takes into consideration before deciding whether to confirm the death sentence. Judges are not required to change their preliminary death sentence on the Grand Mufti’s advice, but they do consult his opinion. Courts do not make the Grand Mufti’s opinions public. Once the panel of judges confirm a death sentence, it can then be subject to appeal.
The Index tracks both preliminary death sentences referred to the Grand Mufti as well as the smaller number of death sentences that are confirmed by courts following the Mufti’s consideration. While some preliminary death sentences are not confirmed, preliminary sentences are an important aspect of the death penalty landscape in Egypt.
Criminal and political trials
The Index separates death penalty trials into two categories: political trials and criminal trials. This is a common distinction among contemporary observers of the death penalty in Egypt, but is not a distinction in law.
Capital trials in the Index are listed as ‘political’ where the alleged facts of the case and the perceived motivation for the commission of the offence are in some way connected to the political and societal changes that have arisen in Egypt since the January 2011 revolution. Charges often stem from broadly defined provisions for terrorism and state security offences in the Penal Code, which have enabled the broad criminalisation of the exercise of fundamental rights and freedoms, in contravention of international standards. Offences which resulted in death sentences under the political category were:
By contrast, death penalty trials were listed in the Index as ‘criminal’ where the facts of the case and the perceived motivation for the commission of the offence were not deemed to be connected to political events in Egypt. Offences which resulted in death sentences under the criminal category included premeditated murder, rape and drugs trafficking.
Users will note that the Index includes more information about political trials than criminal trials. There are several reasons for this. Firstly, there is simply more information available about political trials because these trials receive considerably greater media coverage, both in Egypt and abroad, and because the larger average number of defendants in political trials affords human rights defenders more opportunities to access original court documents from those cases.
Additionally, there is some available information about criminal trials that has not yet been included in the Index. For example, while each death sentence resulting from a political trial is categorised in the Index according to one of the offences enumerated in the bullet pointed list above, the 1,077 death sentences resulting from criminal trials are all listed under the same generic offence category: “criminal incident.” Through analysis of media reports, it is possible to document the specific offences which led to many of these death sentences in criminal trials as above, murder, rape and drugs trafficking charges often led to death sentences. This is something Reprieve and Daftar Ahwal are currently working on, but because considerably more corroborating information was available on political trials in the form of court documents, priority was given to analysis of those trials. Upon the completion of a full listing of offences leading to death sentences in criminal trials, this information will be added to the Index, wherever it is legally possible for us to do so.
Users will also see references to different presidential periods in Egyptian history.
The pre-Sisi period comprises the consecutive rule of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) and then the rule of President Mohammed Morsi, the respective rulers of Egypt between the removal of President Hosni Mubarak (25 January 2011) and Morsi’s removal from power (2 July 2013). The Sisi period includes both the tenure of interim President Adly Mansour (4 July 2013 – 7 June 2014) and current President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi (8 June 2014 – present). While Mansour was appointed interim president by then-Field Marshal el-Sisi following the ouster of President Morsi on 3 July 2013, and stepped down when el-Sisi officially took office as president on 8 June 2014, it is widely accepted that throughout Mansour’s tenure as interim president, el-Sisi was Egypt’s de facto leader.
In assembling the Index, a set of criteria for including individuals in the database was compiled. These criteria are preliminary death sentence referrals, time period and geographical location.
Preliminary death sentence referrals
The Index only tracks individuals whose sentences were at least referred to the Grand Mufti following a preliminary death sentence. Individuals progressed to various outcomes following their referrals, including confirmed death sentences, prison terms and acquittals, but all individuals included in the Index were at the least referred for a preliminary death sentence by an Egyptian court.
All individuals included in the Index must have received a preliminary or confirmed death sentence between 25 January 2011 and 23 September 2018 (the day Reprieve and Daftar Ahwal stopped gathering data for this project). The date listed for each death sentence is the date of the verdict in that individual’s first trial. In some cases, some details about a death sentence could be confirmed, but the date of the verdict could not. In such cases in the Index, the date is marked unknown.
Wherever possible, statistical analysis of the data is separated into two periods: the pre- Sisi period (25 January 2011 to 2 July 2013) and the Sisi period (3 July 2013 to 23 September 2018).
All preliminary and confirmed death sentences must have been issued by Egyptian courts, regardless of the location of the alleged offence. These statistics are broken down by the individual Egyptian governorate in which each sentence was recommended or confirmed.
After determining the inclusion criteria, a list of every known individual who received at least a preliminary death sentence during the specified period was compiled. Individuals were identified through three different types of sources: official documentation, legal sources, and human rights sources.
Wherever possible, entries in the Index were verified by a process of triangulation, whereby data was validated using cross-verification from as many of these three source categories as were available. This proved possible in many political trials, as the court judgments are more readily available and media coverage is extensive, but more difficult in criminal trials.
Approximately 60% of the entries in the Index (1,949 of a total 3,257) were identified and verified through official documentation, which includes written judgments, submissions made to the court by prosecutors and written police reports, in addition to either legal sources and/or human rights sources.
Where official documentation was unavailable, the remaining 40% of entries (1,308 of a total 3,257) were drawn from legal sources as the main source of information. These included media reports that quote directly from court archives, as well as court reporters, lawyers and law firms contacted by Reprieve and its partners.
The Index also includes information from human rights sources in the form of information published by Egyptian and international NGOs, activists, human rights defenders and campaigns, though these were used mostly as a complementary source of information to expand on information gleaned from official documentation and legal sources.
Once the information was collected and verified, to the extent possible, for 3,257 individuals the final step was to build a metadata structure to allow for the extraction of trends from the overall dataset. Analysis of metadata—a term which refers to data that provides information about other data—allows the user to build a much more nuanced picture of Egypt’s death penalty phenomenon.
The metadata structure was built into a confidential and protected Excel spreadsheet in which each row corresponded to an individual who received a preliminary or confirmed death sentence (3,257 rows). Columns were created to become a series of filterable metadata field (50 in total).
This structure allows for the use of sequential metadata fields to glean an ever more nuanced picture of the death penalty in Egypt. For example, a user of the Index can see exactly how many preliminary death sentences were definitively recommended by Egyptian courts between 25 January 2011 and 23 September 2018 (2,595). The user can then further narrow that to reveal how many of those sentences were recommended to defendants in absentia (742). By filtering through additional metadata categories, one can then reveal that of those 742 individuals, 273 were referred for a death sentence in 2014, of whom five were convicted in a military court. These filters can be combined in thousands of different ways to reveal the scope of Egypt’s application of the death penalty.
There were a number of difficulties in gathering and verifying the data in the Index. The three most significant challenges were geographical issues, security concerns and missing information.
Egypt is a large country, and many death sentences originated in remote districts, far from the capital. This creates a challenge for Cairo-based human rights professionals, as it is not feasible to travel to every governorate where a death sentence was recommended or confirmed. Geography also poses an obstacle to gathering accurate information about trial proceedings; it is difficult for Cairo-based lawyers and human rights defenders to travel repeatedly to remote parts of the country to attend trials, especially given that it is not uncommon for trials in Egypt to be adjourned dozens of times.
Ongoing security risks to human rights defenders also posed a challenge, as rights activists have been targeted, arbitrarily detained and imprisoned by the ruling regime. This issue was compounded by geographical challenges, as security concerns can make it unsafe for human rights defenders to travel long distances across the country doing human rights work.
Missing or inaccurate information was another challenge. Media reporting on death penalty trials was sometimes inaccurate, misused legal terminology, provided misleading or contradictory information, or did not consistently cover a case from beginning to end. This was particularly problematic in criminal cases, where data is often scarce or unavailable. Official court documentation from Egyptian trials is also often inconsistent, and some court judgments obtained by Reprieve and its partners were missing key information.
All of these issues were taken into consideration in the course of collecting and verifying information for the Index. To mitigate geographical issues, Reprieve sought out original court documents from trials around the country, often shared electronically by partner organisations or lawyers already in possession of these documents. In some cases, Reprieve investigators traveled to courthouses to obtain original court documents, taking all possible security precautions.
Issues related to missing information were addressed wherever possible by cross- verifying data with multiple sources. However, because the functioning of Egypt’s judiciary is extremely opaque, especially given the increasing use of enormous mass trials, there are some death sentences about which little to no information was available; the Index reflects where this is the case: as users navigate the Index they will see that some pieces of information (date of sentence, offence, etc.) are marked “unknown.” Users will also notice that some statistical fields are marked ‘0’. This does not mean that there are definitively zero individuals in that particular statistical category, but rather it was not possible to confirm the existence of any such individuals using the available data.
Egypt Death Penalty Index Privacy Statement
The Egypt Death Penalty Index and data privacy
The Egypt Death Penalty Index (http://www.egyptdeathpenaltyindex.com/) is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. This privacy statement applies in relation to the Egypt Death Penalty Index (hereinafter referred to as ‘Egypt Death Penalty Index’ or ‘our initiative’). The Egypt Death Penalty Index is a joint initiative of Daftar Ahwal, an independent research center for archiving, documentation, statistics and studies, registered according to the Egyptian law; and Reprieve, a company limited by guarantee incorporated in England and Wales, registered company number 5777831, and a registered charity in England and Wales, charity number 1114900. Reprieve’s registered office address is 10 Queen Street Place, London, EC4R 1BE (hereinafter, Reprieve and Daftar Ahwal are referred to as “we, our or us”).
The Egypt Death Penalty Index is hosted separately from Reprieve’s main website]. This privacy statement sets out the basis on which the Egypt Death Penalty Index, Reprieve and Daftar Ahwal will process any personal information that we may collect about you as a visitor to the Egypt Death Penalty Index website.
The information that we collect about you
We may collect and process the following information about you:
The uses that we make of your information
We may use your information for the following purposes:
We may from time to time review information about you held in our systems – including the contents of and other information related to your email and other communications with us – for compliance and business-protection purposes as described above. This may include reviews for the purposes of disclosure of information relevant to litigation and/or reviews of records relevant to internal or external regulatory or criminal investigations. To the extent permitted by applicable law these reviews will be conducted in a reasonable and proportionate way and approved at an appropriate level of Reprieve’s management. They may ultimately involve disclosure of your information to governmental agencies and litigation counterparties as described below. Your emails and other communications may also occasionally be accessed by persons other than the member of staff with whom they are exchanged for ordinary management purposes (for example, where necessary when a staff member is out of the office, is no longer involved in the Egypt Death Penalty Index initiative, or has left Reprieve or Daftar Ahwal).
We will only process your personal information as necessary so that we can pursue the purposes described above, and then only where we have concluded that our processing does not prejudice you or your privacy in a way that would override our legitimate interest in pursuing those purposes. In exceptional circumstances we may also be required by law to disclose or otherwise process your personal information. We will tell you, when we ask you to provide information about yourself, if provision of the requested information is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation or, on the other hand, if it is purely voluntary and there will be no implications if you decline to provide the information. Otherwise you should assume that we need the information for our organisation or compliance purposes (as described above). If you are uncertain as to the Egypt Death Penalty Index’s need for information that we request from you, please contact the Egypt Death Penalty Index representative asking for the information, or Contact us (see below), with your query.
If we are using your sensitive personal data (including personal data relating to your racial or ethnic origin, political, religious and philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, sexual orientation or health, we will only do so with your explicit consent or, if otherwise, only to the extent permitted by applicable law.
Disclosure and international transfer of your information
We may disclose personal information about you, where reasonably necessary for the various purposes set out above:
These disclosures may involve transferring your personal information overseas. If you are dealing with us within the European Economic Area (or the UK, after it has left the European Economic Area), you should be aware that this may include transfers to countries outside the European Economic Area / UK, which do not have similarly strict data privacy laws. In those cases, where we transfer personal data to other members of the Reprieve group, to Daftar Ahwal or our service providers, we will ensure that our arrangements with them are governed by data transfer agreements, designed to ensure that your personal information is protected, on terms approved for this purpose by the European Commission. Please Contact us (see below) if you would like to know whether any such agreements are in place or, if so, to see a copy.
Retention and deletion of your information
We will delete the information that we hold about you when we no longer need it. For specific information about our record retention policies, please contact us (see below).
You may have a right of access to the personal information that we hold about you, and to some related information, under data protection law. You can also require any inaccurate personal information to be corrected or deleted. You can object to our use of your personal information for direct marketing purposes at any time and you may have the right to object to our processing of some or all of your personal information (and require them to be deleted) in some other circumstances.
If you wish to exercise any of these rights, please contact us as set out below. You can also lodge a complaint about our processing of your personal information with the Information Commissioners Office.
We welcome questions, comments and requests regarding this privacy statement and our processing of personal information. Please send them to email@example.com or call 0207 553 8140.
Changes to this policy
Any changes we make to this privacy statement in the future will be posted to the Egypt Death Penalty Index website at http://www.egyptdeathpenaltyindex.com/ and also available if you contact us. Please check back frequently to see any change.
These terms tell you the rules for using our Egypt Death Penalty Index website (http://www.egyptdeathpenaltyindex.com/) / (“our site”).
1-WHO WE ARE AND HOW TO CONTACT US
2-BY USING OUR SITE YOU ACCEPT THESE TERMS
3-OTHER TERMS THAT MAY APPLY TO YOU
4-SUSPENsion OR WITHDRAWal of OUR SITE
5-using MATERIAL ON OUR SITE
6-RELIANCE ON INFORMATION
7-third party websites
10-LINKING TO OUR SITE
11-WHICH COUNTRY’S LAWS APPLY TO ANY DISPUTES?
Acceptable Use Policy
www.egyptdeathpenaltyindex.com is a joint initiative of Daftar Ahwal, an independent research center for archiving, documentation, statistics and studies, registered according to Egyptian law; and Reprieve, a company limited by guarantee incorporated in England and Wales, registered company number 5777831, and a registered charity in England and Wales, charity number 1114900. Reprieve’s registered office address is 10 Queen Street Place, London, EC4R 1BE (“we, our or us”).
2-Other terms that may apply to you
3-Changes to the terms of this policy
7-Suspension and termination
8-Limitation of liability
9-Which country’s laws apply to any disputes?
10-Changes to the acceptable use policy
Last updated: 14 March 2019